We see this every day. The cheerleader becomes simply the cheerleader, the member of the school band is labeled as just that, and even those who do not belong to a category get put into one. In movies, the popular football player goes for the shy girl. While this creates a misconception that producers are defying stereotypes, it is actually doing the exact opposite. Viewers have already put these characters into their labeled boxes, which is why we love it when the couple ends up together. This applies to gender stereotypes as well, even in things as small and insignificant as colors and hair styles. Most of the time in movies and books, the females are thin with long hair and typical beauty features. These are the stories that appeal the most to viewers because they are seen as ideal. Whether we notice we are doing it or not, we are playing into the stereotypes and labels.
Imagine this: A couple falls in love, but plot
twist: they are just an ordinary couple. This could be a boy and a girl, a girl
and a girl, or a boy and a boy, but it doesn't matter. The author/movie
producer chooses to focus on their personalities, stories, and connection as
opposed to the stereotypes that they are somehow (but not really) defying. Instead
of focusing on labels, the book/movie completely ignores them, making the
characters into people with more depth than one or two labels.
This could cause either nothing
or everything, but both would be extraordinary. The reader/viewer could possibly not react at all, and maybe even feel as if they have wasted a
fraction of their life watching/reading.
Or another possibility: they could relate to the beauty of the piece simply because they were able to experience a genuine story. In
this scenario, you learn to love the characters, and not because they defied
the stereotypes that they were introduced as. You learn to love them for their humor, kindness, and wit. You are able to look at them as more than a
label and as an authentic human being. If more pop culture did this, then maybe in
real life people could adjust to seeing each other as human beings as well.
Insignificant characteristics such as sexual orientation, appearance, and
gender roles could become... well, insignificant as they should be.Diversity is what makes up humanity, and our society would be much less divided if we stopped dividing it by things that do not define a person. We are each so much more than one single adjective. If we started accepting our differences rather than pointing them out, people would have freedom to be themselves without fear of feeling persecuted and unaccepted. If pop culture did not focus so much on peoples' differences and focused more on their positive qualities, people could have the ability to do this as well. Ultimately, the world would be a better place if we could all accept that our differences are what collectively make us human beings; we should start using words of sensitivity that do not degrade each other of worth or depth.
For a similar book review about Ellen Hopkins' IMPULSE, go here.
No comments:
Post a Comment